A Note from Greg Ogeltree
I am pleased to be allowed use of the AAFM Website to share a portion of my patch collection with you.
I have thousands of missile-related patches, and this project illustrates patches from virtually every missile organization that ever produced insignia. You’ll be viewing “pieces of history” that, collectively, relate the mission of nuclear-tipped missiles and those who operated, maintained, and supported that mission—and, in fact, are still doing so today. Patches are a tangible part of our rich missile legacy, linking us to those who wore them on their uniforms. A patch announces, “Hey, I am part of this organization, and I’m proud of what I do!” It was true 50 years ago and it’s still true today.
A word about the patches you’ll be viewing: The scans are of patches actually in my collection, not of decals, metal plaques, art work, etc. And all these patches are authentic patches from the period when the unit was active rather than modern reproductions or collector copies. Because my collection includes what collectors call variations, and because most viewers aren’t really interested in subtle differences in colors or size, I’m including only patch variations that differ is some clearly visible way. If you are a collector and you’re curious about sizes or variations not shown, please contact me.
I wish to thank Colonel Charlie Simpson, who not only allowed me this forum to share my collection, but also has spent countless hours posting the scans and crafting all the accompanying text. I also wish to publicly thank the hundreds of people and organizations who donated a patch to this collection. Hopefully, we can eventually include their names on this site. If you have a patch that’s not pictured in the Gallery and you’d like to share it with everyone else, please consider donating it. Remember, any enjoyment you derive from viewing this collection has been made possible only because many others decided their patches deserved someplace better than the bottom of a drawer or a shoebox on the closet shelf. And if you have access to newly created patches, like those for test launches, SELMs, competitions, training (class patches), or other unofficial “morale” patches, please consider sending one of them this way so we can post it for all to see and enjoy. And now, that’s what I invite you to do—look, and enjoy. I wish you a wonderful journey through these pages!
P.O. Box 937
Lompoc CA 93438-0937
(or contact Greg through AAFM at email@example.com)
When I began collecting patches in the 1970s, reproductions of missile patches did not exist. If someone wanted a patch from a particular unit and found it, they could be 100 percent certain it was an authentic, original patch from the era when the unit was active. That is no longer the case.
The first USAF missile patches to be reproduced (i.e., made after the unit was inactivated) were created in the mid 1980s by the Missile Heritage Foundation (MHF), a private association then active at Vandenberg AFB. Using official art work and descriptions obtained from the Air Force, the MHF commissioned patches for three early strategic missile wings: the 451 SMW, 702 SMW, and 704 SMW.
Another decade elapsed before other missile patches were remade by other missile veterans organizations (e.g., The Tactical Missileers). But rather than serving as fundraisers, these were created principally for former members of units who wanted a patch (or an additional patch) from the unit(s) in which they served. All of these repros can easily be distinguished from original Matador, Mace, Atlas, and Titan I patches because the originals were, with few exceptions, produced on looms (as were the early Titan II and Minuteman patches), whereas the later patches were made on multihead sewing machines and therefore have an entirely different look and feel. EBay made its debut several years later and before long dozens of patch sellers appeared, specializing in reproductions of both older and more recent patches. But rather than being multihead-made, nearly all of these are made on old-fashioned, single-needle sewing machines, guided by hand rather than a computer. As such, they have a distinctive and often sloppy look, making them relatively easy to spot.
Today, many patches offered on eBay are modern recreations of the originals. Sometimes they are identified as such but too often they are not. So if you're looking for a patch for your scrapbook or shadow box, the admonition caveat emptor should be taken to heart. Since all patches displayed in the AAFM Gallery are originals, they can and should be used for comparison when attempting to determine the authenticity of a patch you're considering.
Heritage & Reunion Patches
Two special types of repros with quasi-official status also exist, called Heritage and Reunion patches. Heritage patches are reproductions of earlier patches that were worn by a unit, usually during its World War II era, whose wear on the uniform has been sanctioned, and often even encouraged, by commanders (for example on Fridays). Heritage patches are ordered by the unit or a unit member. Closely-related Reunion patches are similar creations, but differ from Heritage patches in that they have been ordered by a veteran's organization of unit alumni rather than by the an active unit. Visually, there is nothing that differentiates a Heritage from a Reunion patch. In fact, both are often made to mirror, as closely as possible, an original unit patch (exact same size and colors), so the only clues one might have as to their recent origin are the differences in the weave and type of backing. Because Heritage patches originated in the unit, I have included them in the Gallery (and have tried to remember to always label them "Heritage"). Reunion patches are omitted because, generally speaking, they aren't worn by active-duty members.
I should mention that if you're an individual who's considering having your old unit patch reproduced, be advised that official U.S. Air Force emblems are protected by federal law; reproduction for commercial use or for profit is not permitted without express permission from the individual unit commander. And if you're thinking it's okay because your unit was inactivated years ago so there's no one to ask, remember that many units are reactivated later on with different designations (the old 381 SMW at McConnell, which is now the 381 TRG at Vandenberg, is but one example), and even when that's not the case, it could be at some future date because of the USAF's Lineage and Honors system. For emblems from inactive units, the appropriate thing to do would be to ask permission from the Air Force Historical Research Agency, custodian of such emblems.
By the way, unless you need them in quantity, it's easier, and often less expensive, to obtain vintage originals from auction houses, patch dealers, and/or collectors than to have old patches remade. Nevertheless, "Knock-off Kings" will continue to reproduce any patches for which they think there's a market, even when doing so is illegal. As I said before, buyer beware. If you've already used the Gallery for comparison purposes and are still unsure whether a patch you're considering is an original or a reproduction, I'll be happy to provide my opinion. Just forward a scan via the AAFM and I'll get back to you.